Efectividad de las sentencias de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Análisis de los casos contenciosos relacionados con el Estado ecuatoriano durante el periodo 2015-2019

Abstract

This research work is focused on a qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of the judgments of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, based on contentious cases related to the Ecuadorian State during the period 2015-2019. In a first stage, the Inter-American Human Rights System is approached with a specific study of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights regarding its structure, operation, and competencies. In a second stage, a theoretical study of the efficacy, efficiency and effectiveness of the legal norm is carried out; as well as the analysis of the effectiveness of the judgments issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights through the use of different variables or empirical parameters such as: preliminary objections, the merits, comprehensive reparation measures and the supervision of compliance with the judgment. The judgments analyzed in this project are: Gonzáles Lluy and others vs. Ecuador (2015); García Ibarra and others vs. Ecuador (2015); Flor Freire vs. Ecuador (2016); Herrera Espinoza and others vs. Ecuador (2016); Valencia Hinojosa and other vs. Ecuador (2016); and Vásquez Durand and others vs. Ecuador (2017).