Evaluación interna de la Escuela de Medicina de la Facultad de Ciencia Médicas de la Universidad de Cuenca 2005, función docencia, referentes de calidad: caracterización 15, 16 17 y 18

Abstract

It is a descriptive study. The sources of information were: surveys, content analysis; interviews, documents, regulations, verbal or written communications. The assessment tool was developed nationally by AFEME, under the guidelines of CONEA. A series of qualitative questions, which were converted into a quantitative scale, through the semantic differential method is built. The universe and study sample was represented for the School of Medicine. Results: admission mechanisms were rated 47,97que corresponds to regulate in a qualitative and quantitative assessment of CONEA. The fulfillment of objectives and academic goals earned an academic goals and scored a 73,21que corresponds to good and considerdo a fortress under CONEA. The preparation of professionals with social commitment 60,01que scored a good match in quantitative CONEA qualification. Finally, the monitoring and evaluation of learning (.---) 52,98que equals good as qualitative assessment of CONEA. It is concluded that medical school prepares professionals tien sound vocational training are accepted socially: This feature is a fortlaeza. If continuous monitoring and evaluation of the learning program at the School of Medicine is performed, which is a strength